{"id":101,"date":"2022-11-13T16:40:29","date_gmt":"2022-11-13T21:40:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/?page_id=101"},"modified":"2022-11-17T10:11:00","modified_gmt":"2022-11-17T15:11:00","slug":"scenarios-signals-strategies","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/scenarios-signals-strategies\/","title":{"rendered":"Scenarios, Signals & Strategies"},"content":{"rendered":"

Scenarios<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Probable:<\/strong>\n
      \n
    1. Antitrust: New association ethics codes and legislation designed to specifically target anticompetitive behavior. Analytical analysis for the amount of data collected and what will be regarded as too much.<\/li>\n
    2. Cybersecurity\/Cyber Warfare: Sanctions are put into place and the Banking System becomes a target. The market for data security will also increase.<\/li>\n
    3. Political Radicalization: Election denial regarding the 2024 election will occur.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
    4. Plausible:<\/strong>\n
        \n
      1. Antitrust: Cloud neutrality will occur, as will new anti-competitive organizations working at the state level (specifically those that monitor larger companies and their \u201cmergers and acquisitions\u201d activity), and Culture Capture will grow in usage.<\/li>\n
      2. Cybersecurity\/Cyber Warfare: AI, cloud, robots, and drones will be used more, leading cybercrimes to skyrocket in the coming years. National cyber defenses will also increase.<\/li>\n
      3. Political Radicalization: Civil War is plausible, more non-for-profit organizations will exist that adapt to emerging issues faster, and digital ID will gain greater usage.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
      4. Possible:<\/strong>\n
          \n
        1. Antitrust: It\u2019s possible that the market will be data driven, and new systems that monitor anti-competitive behavior will exist. Larger-scale mergers and acquisitions will occur as data privacy becomes more vital.<\/li>\n
        2. Cybersecurity\/Cyber Warfare: New security algorithms will be created and larger scale data attacks with the potential for the supply chain to suffer will occur, as will international conflicts stemming from cyber-attacks.<\/li>\n
        3. Political Radicalization: The electoral process changes, and insider threat programs and income inequality grow.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          \"How<\/p>\n

          Signals<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Antitrust:<\/strong>\n
              \n
            1. Increased focus on Private Equity in Health Care. Pharmaceuticals, agriculture, health care and finance, have hurt consumers and workers and stunted economic growth.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
            2. Cybersecurity\/Cyber Warfare:<\/strong>\n
                \n
              1. More Education on STEM and careers in cybersecurity. Financial, political and military gains. Hybrid warfare. Cybercrime facilities. Rich get richer and poor get poorer.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
              2. Political Radicalization:<\/strong>\n
                  \n
                1. Tensions with the 2020 election (January 6th<\/sup> insurrection). Spread of misinformation following various elections. Secretive actions and increased levels of anger amongst politicians and voters.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  \"Signals<\/p>\n

                  Strategies<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Antitrust:<\/strong>\n
                      \n
                    1. Lobbying for antitrust legislation<\/li>\n
                    2. Educate the youth on the potential of data and instruct business students on how to avoid anticompetitive behavior.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
                    3. Cybersecurity\/Cyber Warfare:<\/strong>\n
                        \n
                      1. Implement cyber security learning in K-12<\/li>\n
                      2. Develop cyber warfare capabilities<\/li>\n
                      3. Develop contingency plans for companies and government facilities<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
                      4. Political Radicalization<\/strong>\n
                          \n
                        1. Push risk-factors include emotional vulnerability such as anger, alienation, and disenfranchisement.<\/li>\n
                        2. Individuals could be pushed into radicalization by their perception of the failure of all nonviolent alternatives, including political participation, civil society action, peaceful protest etc.<\/li>\n
                        3. Have a better system for fact checking. Analyze social media data and have an AI analyze for certain keywords and dangerous media.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          \"4<\/p>\n

                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                          Scenarios Probable: Antitrust: New association ethics codes and legislation designed to specifically target anticompetitive behavior. Analytical analysis for the amount of data collected and what…<\/p>\n

                          Continue ReadingScenarios, Signals & Strategies<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":5455,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":8,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5455"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/101\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":135,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/101\/revisions\/135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/policy-government-security\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}