Publications

 

  • Goedert, K.M. & Dudley, C.C. (2015). Embodiment in causal learning? Effects of fluency and body specificity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Science. Turin, Italy. September, 2015. [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Zhang, J.Y. & Barrett, A.M. (2015). Prism adaptation and spatial neglect: the need for dose-finding studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:243. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00243 [pdf]
  • Chen, P., Chen, C., Hreha, K., Goedert, K.M., & Barrett, A.M. (2015) Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) uniquely measures spatial neglect during everyday activities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 869-876. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023.[pdf]
  • Sacchetti, D.L., Goedert, K.M., Foundas, A.L., & Barrett, A.M. (2015). Ipsilesional Neglect: Its behavioral and anatomical correlates. Neuropsychology, 29(2), 183-190. doi.org/10.1037/neu0000122 [pdf]
  • Chen, P., Goedert, K.M, Shah, P., Foundas, A., & Barrett, A.M. (2014). Integrity of medial temporal structures may predict better improvement of spatial neglect with prism adaptation treatment. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 8, 346-358. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9200-5 [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Grimm, L.R., Markman, A.B., & Spellman, B.A. (2014). Self-construal affects the processing of context information in causal inference – but not how you might think. Acta Psychologica, 15, 41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.006. [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Ellefson, M.R. & Rehder, B. (2014). Differences in the weighting and choice of evidence for plausible versus implausible causes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 40, 683-702. doi: 10.1037/a0035547. [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Chen, P., Boston, R.C., Foundas, A.L., & Barrett, A.M. (2014). Presence of motor-intentional deficits predicts functional improvement of spatial neglect with prism adaptation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28, 483-492. doi: 10.1177/1545968313516872. [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Boston, R.C., & Barrett, A.M. (2013). Advancing the science of neglect rehabilitation via improved statistical methods: mixed linear modeling versus repeated-measures ANOVA. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 211. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00211 [pdf]
  • Barrett, A.M., Goedert, K.M., & Basso, J.C. (2012). Prism adaptation for spatial neglect after stroke: translational practice gaps. Nature Reviews Neurology, 8, 567-577. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.170 [pdf]
  • Chen, P., Hreha, K., Fortis, P., Goedert, K.M., & Barrett, A.M. (2012). Functional assessment of spatial neglect: A review of the Catherine Bergego Scale and an introduction of the Kessler Foundation-Neglect Assessment Process. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 19(5), 423-435. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-423 [pdf]
  • Chen, P., & Goedert, K.M. (2012). Clock drawing in spatial neglect: A comprehensive analysis of clock perimeter, placement, and accuracy. Journal of Neuropsychology, 6, 270-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-6653.2012.02028.x [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Chen, P., Botticello, A., Adler, U., Masmela, J., & Barrett, A.M. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of neglect assessment in an acute post-stroke sample reveals novel predictor of functional outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 93, 137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.036  [pdf]
  • Fortis, P., Chen, P., Goedert, K.M., & Barrett, A.M. (2011). Effects of prism adaptation on motor-intentional spatial bias in neglect. Neuroreport, 22, 700-705. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834a3e20 [pdf]
  • Chen, P., Goedert, K.M., Murray, E., Kelly, K., Ahmeti, S., & Barrett, A.M. (2011). Spatial bias and right hemisphere function: sex-specific changes with aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 455-462. doi: 10.1017/S135561771100004X [pdf]
  • Fortis, P., Goedert, K.M., & Barrett, A.M. (2011). Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2718– 2727. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.020 [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., LeBlanc, A., Tsai, S., & Barrett, A.M. (2010). Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left and right shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16, 795 – 804. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000597 [pdf]
  • Laux, J.P., Goedert, K.M., & Markman, A.B. (2010). Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 213 – 218. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.213 [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M. (2008).Comparison then computation: A model of independent causal efficacy. In B.C. Love, K. McRae, & V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 173-178). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [pdf]
  • Goedert, K. M. & Miller, J. (2008). Spacing practice sessions across days earlier rather than later in training improves performance of a visuomotor skill. Experimental Brain Research, 189, 189-197. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1414-9 [pdf]
  • Darling, J., Goedert, K. M., Ceynar, M., Shore, W. J., & Anderson, D. A. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What introductory psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 6, 91 – 97. doi: 10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.91 [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., Harsch, J., & Spellman, B.A. (2005). Discounting and conditionalization: Dissociable cognitive processes in human causal inference. Psychological Science, 16, 590 – 595. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01580.x  [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., & Spellman, B.A. (2005). Non-normative discounting: There is more to cue interaction effects than controlling for alternative causes. Learning & Behavior, 33, 197-210. doi: 10.3758/BF03196063 [pdf]
  • Rosell, M.,C. Beck, D.M., Luther, K.E., Goedert, K.M., Shore, W.J., & Anderson, D.A. (2005). Progression of students’ knowledge about psychology: The value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 95-99. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3202_3x [pdf]
  • Bischoff-Grethe, A., Goedert, K.M., Willingham, D.T., & Grafton, S.T (2004). Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 127-138. doi: 10.1162/089892904322755610 [pdf]
  • Goedert, K.M., & Willingham, D.B. (2002). Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learning & Memory, 9, 279 – 292. doi: 10.1101/lm.50102 [pdf]
  • Willingham, D.B., & Goedert, K. (2001). The role of taxonomies in the study of human memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 250-265. doi: 10.3758/CABN.1.3.250 [pdf]
  • Willingham, D.B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531-534. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00201 [pdf]
  • Mutter, S.A., & Goedert, K. M. (1997). Frequency discrimination versus frequency estimation: Adult age differences and the effect of divided attention. Journal of Gerontology, 52B, P319 – P328. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52B.6.P319 [pdf]

Recent Posts