{"id":1757,"date":"2019-07-10T17:53:31","date_gmt":"2019-07-10T21:53:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/?page_id=1757"},"modified":"2019-07-10T17:53:31","modified_gmt":"2019-07-10T21:53:31","slug":"narrative-introduction-to-the-new-syllabus-for-college-english-i","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/narrative-introduction-to-the-new-syllabus-for-college-english-i\/","title":{"rendered":"Narrative Introduction to the New Syllabus for College English I"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Like most first-year writing programs\u2014or we should say, like most writing programs until the last ten years or so\u2014ours has focused on \u201cacademic writing.\u201d This phrase is in quotation marks to suggest that there is something questionable about the term.\u00a0 \u201cAcademic writing\u201d implies that there is a generic type of writing that is academic, that academic writing is a <em>genre<\/em> in itself.\u00a0 In fact, of course, academic writing is real only to the extent that it occurs within a discipline.\u00a0 Thus literary analysis, philosophical proof, and ethnography are all academic genres; and they vary quite a bit from one discipline to the next.\u00a0 In other words, <em>generic<\/em> academic writing doesn\u2019t really exist, and we don\u2019t want to teach our students that it does; we don\u2019t want to teach them that they can readily, without reflection, apply what they\u2019ve learned in ENGL1201 to their tasks in biology, psychology, or nursing.<\/p>\n<p>Ed once had a nursing student in his Composition Theory and Practice class.\u00a0 She was in the middle of learning how to do charting\u2014the notes scribbled on charts at the foot of hospital beds\u2014and she was very frustrated because the lessons she took from previous writing classes about narrative details and \u201cgoing in depth\u201d in no way prepared her to do charts.\u00a0 It didn\u2019t help that her nursing instructors didn\u2019t know how to talk to her about the problem she was having, which isn\u2019t surprising because they probably weren\u2019t trained in Writing Across the Curriculum or Writing in the Disciplines.\u00a0 If her ENGL1201 class had focused on making choices appropriate to the rhetorical situation, she might have anticipated challenges to writing in new contexts for different purposes.<\/p>\n<p>We can hear some objections to this line of reasoning (notice, please the naysayer in the text), pointing out that good grammar is good grammar, good punctuation is good punctuation, and concision is concision.\u00a0 While we could point to differences among various disciplines when it comes to the use of passive voice, the first personal singular, and verb tense conventions, we would generally agree with this naysayer.\u00a0 We would even agree\u2014touching on critical thinking here\u2014that mastering the art of developing claims, warrants, and evidence is likely universal, but also point out that we wouldn\u2019t want to teach our first-year students what counts as good evidence in their history classes or which warrants connect evidence and claims in their philosophy class.\u00a0 (For example, Ed Jones got a D+ in his Introduction to Philosophy course in college and, the same semester, got an A- in his Introduction to Poetry class.)\u00a0 Finally, we\u2019d agree that it\u2019s important in all disciplines to cite sources, but we wouldn\u2019t want our students assuming that they were all set just because they could use MLA style.\u00a0 Rather, we\u2019d want them to be able to recognize that citation styles vary quite widely among the professions.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, in general, we would like to teach our students how to be flexible writers, to be aware that they should expect to be surprised when they write in situations that are new to them, whether that be a new discipline or a new job. And we want them to be prepared with a whole arsenal or, more peacefully, a whole tool kit or even better a whole personal theory of writing that can guide them.\u00a0 According to current theory in the world of composition studies, the following are important parts of curricular design:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\">\n<ul>\n<li>Thanks in large part the Writing about Writing movement, started by Wardle and Downs\u2019s seminal 2009 article in <em>College Composition and Communication<\/em>, we\u2019ve learned that students need to develop a vocabulary, a set of key concepts, in order to develop an understanding of how writing works.<\/li>\n<li>These concepts may best be thought of as <em>threshold concepts<\/em>, which according to Meyer and Land represent the \u201cconceptual and ontological shifts students must undertake to achieve capability in writing\u201d (Adler-Kassner and Wardle). The word \u201contological\u201d here might seem a bit odd, but any FYW instructors will recognize, as just one example, the angst students can experience when giving up the narrative \u201cI\u201d and discovering a new voice that emerges <em>as they become thinkers<\/em> in relation to sources.<\/li>\n<li><em>Reflection<\/em>, which requires key concepts to occur at all, is central to students\u2019 really owning the new relationship they start to develop with writing and the writing processes that enable this more flexible (or adaptable) approach to writing.<\/li>\n<li>All of the above is designed to create an experience of learning to write that is <em>transferable<\/em>, an emphasis that has inspired much of our new curriculum and that is articulated in Yancey, Robertson, and Taczak\u2019s <em>Writing Across Contexts Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Within this larger context, a focus on the rhetorical situation is fundamental.\u00a0 We want students to use writing to act in the world, which is what rhetoric is all about: a <em>writer<\/em> (or <em>rhetor<\/em>) trying to accomplish a <em>purpose<\/em> (to address an <em>exigence<\/em>) by moving an <em>audience<\/em>. \u00a0And we want to help students see that being a writer involves making choices\u2014about <em>genres<\/em> most appropriate for a given audience and about the medium through which the audience may be best addressed.\u00a0 Primarily, we want to help students see that writing is not (definitely NOT) primarily an act of following rules, even though virtually every classroom they\u2019ve been in has reinforced that belief.\u00a0 We want students to see that writing does not meaning following rules but, instead, always involves making choices.\u00a0 That means that, in whatever way we can, we give students opportunities to make choices, with real purposes, to reach real audiences.<\/p>\n<p>The challenge is to develop courses to teach students some of the generic skills that <em>do<\/em> transfer in an unsophisticated way and at the same time teach skills that normally do not transfer easily. Psychologists like Perkins and Salomon call the transfer of knowledge from one situation to a very similar situation \u201cnear transfer.\u201d\u00a0 Near transfer describes the knowledge that sources have to be cited for a paper in ENGL1201 and also in ENGL1202; slightly less near would be recognizing that sources have to be cited in any discipline. We will continue to teach such near-transfer skills like citation, the conventions of formality and paragraphing, and the importance of evidence.\u00a0 For this reason, the major assignments in the new curriculum will look similar to those in the old curriculum.\u00a0 But the overall approach is quite different, because it requires that students become articulate about rhetorical choices and be given multiple opportunities to enact those choices.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What will be common in the new common syllabus<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Students must be given opportunities to make rhetorical choices\u2014for example, between academic audiences and other audiences\u2014and to analyze real-word genres such as a <em>New York Times <\/em>book review to learn how to accomplish the tasks of our current \u201cAnalytic Essay of a Written Text.&#8221;\u00a0 Writing assignments should not primarily be about following teacher-given guidelines for writing but about developing students\u2019 own explicit and embodied knowledge of acting in various rhetorical situations.\u00a0 In addition, assignments should build on and encourage students\u2019 own sense of curiosity about the world and language.\u00a0 After all, inquiry is what drives the academic enterprise.<\/p>\n<p>Students will be explicitly be introduced to the following concepts and be responsible for knowing their definitions and for applying them in various ways: Purpose (exigence), audience, rhetor (writer\/stance), constraints, context, medium, genre, ethos\/pathos\/logos, style, design, writing process.\u00a0 The overall construct of rhetorical situation contains most of these concepts.<\/p>\n<p>Students will reflect on their writing process(es) and on their understanding of the key concepts in relation to their own writing throughout the semester, in metatexts, as part of the final exam in which they create their own personalized theory of writing, and possibly in other informal writing assignments.<\/p>\n<p>Downs, Douglas, and Liane Robertson, \u201cThreshold Concepts in First-Year Composition.\u201d <em>Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies<\/em>, edited by Linda Adler-Kassner and Elizabeth Wardle, UP Colorado, 2015. <a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.com\/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=EXrgCwAAQBAJ&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PT10&amp;dq=writing+concepts+knowledge+transfer+wardle+adler&amp;ots=I9F05AZvtA&amp;sig=D7MD1U-d_aRl7Uoc_1zHUkenHyw#v=onepage&amp;q=downs&amp;f=false\">https:\/\/books.google.com\/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=EXrgCwAAQBAJ&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PT10&amp;dq=writing+concepts+knowledge+transfer+wardle+adler&amp;ots=I9F05AZvtA&amp;sig=D7MD1U-d_aRl7Uoc_1zHUkenHyw#v=onepage&amp;q=downs&amp;f=false<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Perkins, David N. and Gavriel Salomon.\u00a0\u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/learnweb.harvard.edu\/alps\/thinking\/docs\/traencyn.htm\">Transfer of Learning<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0<em>International Encyclopedia of Education<\/em>, 2<sup>nd<\/sup> ed. Pergamon Press, 1992.<\/p>\n<p>Yancey, Kathleen Blake, et al. Writing across Contexts\u202f: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Logan\u202f: Utah State University Press, 2014., 2014.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Like most first-year writing programs\u2014or we should say, like most writing programs until the last ten years or so\u2014ours has focused on \u201cacademic writing.\u201d This phrase is in quotation marks to suggest that there is something questionable about the term.\u00a0 \u201cAcademic writing\u201d implies that there is a generic type of writing that is academic, that &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/narrative-introduction-to-the-new-syllabus-for-college-english-i\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Narrative Introduction to the New Syllabus for College English I&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":637,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1757","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1757"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1757\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1758,"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1757\/revisions\/1758"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogs.shu.edu\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}