Why Bosnia and Herzegovina Should Not Be Ignored

800px-Sarajevo_Rathaus05

By Dana Terry

Roughly two decades ago, Bosnia was engulfed in a bloody ethnic war based on corrupt nationalist agendas and mired by ethnic cleansing. Though Bosnia is no longer the bloody war zone it once was, it still faces many issues that have hindered its post-conflict recovery and yields cause for concern. There are still Bosnian-Serb radicals who seek to undermine the terms of the 1995 Dayton Peace agreement by advocating secession from the already fractured state. If this issue is ignored, Bosnia could easily become a failed state vulnerable to falling back into the same cycle of bloody ethnic conflict.

The 1995 Dayton Peace Accord was only meant to be a temporary solution to end the bloodshed by dividing the country now known as BiH (Bosnia and Herzegovina) into two separate entities: The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska.  Unfortunately, no steps have been taken towards unifying these two entities and this has led to an ethno-political system vulnerable to deadlock, weak centralized institutions, and a country that could easily become destabilized.

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s ethno-political system stands in the way of acceptance into the EU and NATO, which has been outlined as an important goal for regional conflict transformation by both the Obama and Bush administrations. The current political paradigm of BiH has been charged with violating the European Convention on Human Rights and mandated constitutional reform. The problem with the Bosnian constitution is that it only recognizes three ethnicities – Bosniak Muslims, Catholic Croats, and Orthodox Serbs – and offers a miscellaneous category known as the “Other” for all remaining peoples. Since the Bosnian Proportional Representation system is constructed on the basis of ethnicity, only these three constitutionally recognized peoples are allowed to participate in the second chamber of state parliament as well as the tripartite presidency. This minimizes the political voice of minorities such as Jews, Roma, and people from ethnically mixed marriages. Such discrimination was found in a 2009 court case before the ECHR to be in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (right to free elections), Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 (general prohibition of discrimination). Without the adequate constitutional reform, BiH will not have the legitimacy needed to be accepted into the Euro-Atlantic institutions and will miss the benefits that come with such membership.

From a purely national security stance, a failed BiH (Bosnia and Herzegovina) may not seem like a threat to global security, but a failed BiH could become a safe haven for terrorists.  Terrorism and Islamic extremism are already a threat in the region. The most recent example was the October 2011attack on the U.S. Embassy in Sarajevo. In this attack, an Islamic extremist used an AK-47 assault rifle to fire on the embassy for roughly half an hour before he was shot and arrested by the local police. The FBI has since assisted local police in investigating this particular incident as well as other possible extremist activity and roughly $1.25 million in USA has been allocated to the Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining, and Related (NADR) account.

The Obama Administration’s goal to strengthen relations with the Muslim world has also made BiH a strategic focus. BiH, along with other Southeast countries such as Albania and Turkey, are the only Muslim states in Europe and thus are seen as a strategic link between the Muslim world and the West. Should the US ever decide to withdraw all aid from BiH, there would be a great grievance amongst the region’s Muslim population which could seriously damage relations with the rest of the Muslim world. Also, cutting back on aid and projects in BiH would allow Russia and Saudi Arabia to have an even greater influence in the region.

There is a laundry list of problems facing BiH which proves that it is still a state in need of aid, guidance, and support.  Though it’s not the blood soaked country it once was, BiH should still be considered a hot spot for possible future conflict. Furthermore, BiH should continue to be treated like the strategic state it is, and continue to enjoy close ties with the US as well as other western states. The media may have forgotten BiH, but it is important that western policymakers do not forget its relevance.

*****

Dana Terry is a first year Master’s candidate at the Whitehead School of Diplomacy. She specializes in post-conflict negotiations and international organizations.

Share

5 thoughts on “Why Bosnia and Herzegovina Should Not Be Ignored

  • February 3, 2013 at 3:33 pm
    Permalink

    Actually, you’re wrong. The International Criminal Tribunal has ruled that what happened in Bosnia was not a “civil war” but an international armed conflict. Also, Serbs were responsible for some 90 percent of all war crimes, including the crime of Genocide.

    Reply
    • February 4, 2013 at 1:10 am
      Permalink

      Amir, you made a great point.

      Reply
    • February 7, 2013 at 3:38 pm
      Permalink

      Amazing stats amir considering 34% of the casualties were Serbian and another 10% of the casualties resulted from fighting between bosnian muslims and croats and to a lesser extent Bosnian Muslims forces fighting Fikret Abdic’s forces. So despite nearly half the murdering being done by Bosnian Muslims and Croats, Serbs got blamed for 90% of the war crimes. When murdering and expelling Serbian people is not considered a crime as proven famously with the acquitals of Naser Oric, Ante Gotovina and Markac saying 90% of the convictions at the Hague were against Serbs is actually quite meaningless.

      Reply
      • January 21, 2016 at 1:28 pm
        Permalink

        hahahahah You live in an ilusion my son,who told you that,your father lololol 90%casulties were serbian hahahaha.Your father lied to you kid.Serbs committed a genocide upon Bosnians .You are just another nationalist who seeks great serbia .Bosnia left yougoslavia in peace because Its most constitutive people Bosnians and Croats voted .But the Genocide people serbians,already planed since 1980s to kill every single one of Bosnians and Croats on the Bosnia land.

        Reply
  • June 24, 2014 at 11:39 am
    Permalink

    What happened in bih was not an international armed conflict but a genocide of Bosnian people. To ensure it does not happen the republic of sprksa should be abolished and single presidency should be established.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Alen Bar Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *